This is not a movie review. This is not a piece to defend The Hangover Part 2 and its creators. This is simply a humble feedback towards comments on the film’s so-called negative representation of Thailand.
A few blogs and news articles, including The Bangkok Post, have published appalling reactions on how the movie’s raunchy plot desecrated what the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) has been working hard for.
Well, that’s what they think. But I disagree. Right after the movie, I just wanted to be in Bangkok. I’ve been there before, got drunk, got into a little trouble with the folks at Patpong, and enjoyed every minute I had in one of the most interesting cities of South East Asia.
In a land where one can get arrested by simply posting an online link of a banned publication (I don’t need to elaborate on this), it is quite surprising that something as wild and smutty as The Hangover Part 2 could actually pass the Thailand film board and gain permission to shoot on different locations. The Bangkok Post critic asked if the people behind the film board are no longer perturbed by drug-dealing monkeys and ladyboy nudity. I cannot speak for the TAT. But, corruption, drugs, prostitution, crime and violence exist in every country, not just in Thailand. Besides, do you really think a peaceful place exists here on earth? It probably does if you’re thinking of Aokigahara.
Negative elements may mirror one side of a city like Bangkok, but it cannot speak for an entire nation like Thailand. Bangkok, however, is still a beautiful city despite a few abrasions that are no longer alien to the rest of the capital cities of the world.
The Wat Phra Kaew at sunset, the Grand Palace, the floating markets, and the garish street of Khao San are just some of Bangkok’s gems. Then there’s Phuket, Chiang Mai, Pattaya, and many other areas in Thailand that ignite the word AMAZING in the TAT’s slogan.
A few tweets were a bit inconceivable. If not for the lavish amount of consumed substances, Bangkok could have been a peaceful walk for the Wolfpack. What triggered the fear of those who tweeted to avoid Bangkok after watching The Hangover Part 2?
Kimmy, the ladyboy, whose line “You’re in BangCOCK sweetie” erupted with a show of his genitalia possibly shocked a few viewers. Transwomen, however, don’t exist in Bangkok alone. Perhaps, it was the sleaziness of the red light district or the debauchery that opposes your definition of “Pleasantville”. But come to think of it, these are all subjective.
The bottomline: The Hangover Part 2 made Thailand more astonishing than it already is. And I believe the TAT couldn’t thank the creators enough.
As for Justin Bartha’s comment, no one has to pay attention to it. It’s simply made by a man who has yet to be exposed to the different cultures of the world.
NOTE: (I have nothing against Mr. Bartha, but his general comment was outright offensive and uncalled for.)
PS: Here are a few snapshots from my Bangkok trip in 2009 (just to show you how interestingly beautiful it is):